Supple v. Wheeler
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kalamazoo; Collingwood (Charles B.), J., presiding. Bill by Frances H. Supple against Kate Henderson Wheeler and others for the cancellation of a deed. Albert C. Barley was permitted to intervene and file a bill claiming under a prior deed which had been destroyed. From a decree dismissing the bills, plaintiff Barley appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
In April, 1919, Frances H. Supple and Kate Henderson Wheeler owned lots 5 and 6 of the revised plat of the Henderson plat in the city of Kalamazoo. Frances H. Supple owned a three-fifths interest. Kate Henderson Wheeler owned a two-fifths interest. The property came to them partly by inheritance, and partly by purchase of the interest of other heirs. It was heavily mortgaged and there were *670outstanding taxes and tax titles against it. They desired to sell the property and listed it with Sanford A. Wiltsey, a real estate agent doing business at the city of Kalamazoo, but did not give him…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thatcher v. Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Andrew's ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Stevens v. CastelMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Loomis v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Roup v. RoupMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. McKennaMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas v. LedgerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Frankiewicz v. KonwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929