Cherry v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
The only error we need consider is one which is directed to the refusal of the court to grant appellant’s motion to direct a verdict at the close of the testimony. A careful study of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that this motion should have been granted.
The facts may be said to he almost without conflict. On January 25, 1934, a truck loaded with 655 cases of canned goods was traveling from Indiana to Wisconsin on U. S. Route 30. Near Aurora, Illinois, four highway men, at the point of their revolvers, took the truck from the driver and drove the same to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gerard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Reid v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- Rabideau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pedro Amado Torres v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Robert E. Burns and Margaret Ann GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. WainerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- United States v. Owen LambertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.