Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1930No. 22423. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

We have here an action based upon two life insurance policies seeking recovery on behalf of the beneficiary because of the presumption of the death of the insured, arising from seven years’ unexplained absence. The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of the defendant. A motion for a new trial was interposed, and the trial court, concluding that the jury had been erroneously instructed, set aside the verdict and granted a new trial. The defendant has appealed.

The order granting a new trial is based upon the specific ground that a certain part of a certain instruction was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butler v. Supreme CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Peterson v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ada Blew v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  2. Howard v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Bentley v. FrengerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Brunny v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Patrick v. Union Central Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API