Legal Opinion

EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'N OF ARIZ. v. Bruce Church, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1973No. 10757PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice:

The Employment Security Commission appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court of Yuma County, reversing the ruling of the Commission concerning the status of certain employees of Growers Service and Equipment Co. The Commission had ruled that the services performed by the employees in question were not exempt employment within the definitions of agricultural labor as set out in A.R.S. § 23— 603, subsec. A, par. 2 or, subsec. A, par. 4.

The issue to be determined is whether the employees of Growers Service and Equipment Co. employed in the operation of the vacuum cooling…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. BurgerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Employment Security Commission v. Arizona Citrus GrowersArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In re the Claims of LazarusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. Ewing v. McLeanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. Bell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Central Citrus Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  2. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Blue Line Distributing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Agri-Foods, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. 9w Halo v. AdorArizona Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API