Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Parmenter v. Wallowa County Court

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 22, 1992No. 90-02-9926; CA A68995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

This case concerns the denial of plaintiffs’ request for restitution in a writ of review proceeding. ORS 34.010 et seq. Plaintiffs seek Supreme Court review of our decision instructing the trial court to dismiss their petition for writ of review for want of jurisdiction. 112 Or App 545, 829 P2d 1054 (1992). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it, withdraw our opinion and reach the merits of plaintiffs’ appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

We take the facts from our earlier opinion:

“In 1989, plaintiffs applied to the Wallowa County Planning Department for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maddox v. Clackamas County School District No. 25Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Henthorn v. Grand Prairie School District No. 14Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sauvie Island Agricultural League v. GGS (Hawaii), Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Parmenter v. Wallowa County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hatley v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Ettner v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Ettner v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API