United States v. Hammer
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT UPON FURTHER REVIEW
MALLOY, Senior Judge:
This is the second time this case has come before this Court for review. We previously affirmed the appellant’s conviction by a general court-martial for raping and taking indecent liberties with a six-year-old child, indecently exposing himself to a five-year-old child, and possessing child pornography, in *812violation of Articles 120 and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 934. We also affirmed the appellant’s approved sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 18 years, and reduction to E-l. United States v. Hammer, ACM 33663…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. DatavsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
- United States v. DatavsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
- United States v. GereUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. Sergeant ROBERT B. BERGDAHLArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019