Legal Opinion

United States v. Hammer

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 16, 2004No. ACM 33663 (f rev)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT UPON FURTHER REVIEW

MALLOY, Senior Judge:

This is the second time this case has come before this Court for review. We previously affirmed the appellant’s conviction by a general court-martial for raping and taking indecent liberties with a six-year-old child, indecently exposing himself to a five-year-old child, and possessing child pornography, in *812violation of Articles 120 and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 934. We also affirmed the appellant’s approved sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 18 years, and reduction to E-l. United States v. Hammer, ACM 33663…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DatavsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
  2. United States v. DatavsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
  3. United States v. GereUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  4. United States v. Sergeant ROBERT B. BERGDAHLArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API