Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Datavs

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided November 9, 2011No. ACM 37537Published

1DissentRoan, Judge

Even affording trial defense counsel the “strong presumption that [their] conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance,” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct. 2052, under the facts of this case, their failure to procure the services of an expert in sexual assault examinations amounted to ineffective assistance that prejudiced the appellant’s case. I therefore dissent from the majority opinion.

In preparing a defense, “counsel has a duty to make reasonable investigations or to make a reasonable decision that makes particular investigations unnecessary.” Id. at 691,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API