Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Datavs

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided November 9, 2011No. ACM 37537PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Opinion of the Court · OrrOrr, Senior Judge, joined by Brand, Chief Judge,

Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant of one specification of making a false official statement, one specification of forcible anal sodomy and one specification of forcible oral sodomy, in violation of Articles 107 and 125, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 925. The adjudged sentence consisted of a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to the grade of E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged. The appellant raises four issues for our consideration: 1)…

3Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DatavsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  2. United States v. TalkingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  3. United States v. McMurrinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  4. United States v. AllenUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  5. United States v. GuinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API