Dell, Inc. v. Muniz
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.
In these consolidated proceedings, Dell, Inc., formerly known as Dell Computer Corporation (“Dell”), complains of the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. The parties concede that the arbitration agreement at issue is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and we concur. Accordingly, we dismiss Dell’s interlocutory appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a). Because we hold the trial court abused its discretion in denying Dell’s motion to compel arbitration, we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Glassell Producing Company, Inc. v. Jared Resources, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
- Provencher v. Dell, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Texas Petrochemicals LP v. ISP Water Management Services LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.