Legal Opinion

Utica Mutual Insurance v. Rohm & Haas Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 2010No. Civil Action 08-3812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.

Utica Mutual Insurance Company (“Utica”) seeks a declaration as to the scope of its obligations, if any, to make defense and/or indemnity payments on behalf of Defendants Rohm and Haas Company (“Rohm and Haas”) and Morton International, Inc. (both defendants collectively, “Morton”) with respect to certain lawsuits against Morton (the “Underlying Suits”), some of which have already been settled. Utica began its litigation efforts with a complaint that sought the recovery of settlement payments made by Utica on Morton’s behalf. Morton moved to dismiss…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Axis Specialty Ins. Co. v. Brickman Group Ltd, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Explorer Insurance Company v. Nagel Farm Service, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  3. National Liability & Fire Insurance Company v. Brimar Transit, Inc., Pittsburgh Public School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API