Legal Opinion

Culwell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1952No. 13606PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BORAH, Circuit Judge.

William A. Culwell was charged in a two count indictment with having suborned the witnesses Ruby Booth and Buck Britt to testify falsely in a criminal trial before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas at Dallas, Texas. Having been tried before a jury and found guilty under each of the two counts against him, Culwell has appealed.

The case arose in this way: In September, 1950, the Grand Jury for the District aforementioned returned an indictment in three counts against Hanley R. Booth and Alfred Wayne Lykes. Count one charged in substance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  5. Kuhn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Regino PalaciosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Richard CraveroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. D. H. Walden v. Broce Construction Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  4. Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Avelardo Felix Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API