Legal Opinion
Rea v. Matteucci
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1997No. 96-16154PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Norma Jean Rea appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendants on plaintiffs claim for violation of due process under color of state law. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. E.g., Bagdadi v. Nazar, 84 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir.1996). Because plaintiff was accorded all the process she was due, we AFFIRM.
I. Facts
Prior to June 18, 1993, plaintiff was employed as a hearing officer for the state of Nevada; pursuant to statute, her position was classified…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Higginbotham v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Bowers v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Proksa v. Arizona State Schools for Deaf & the BlindArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Rea v. MatteucciCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- McInerney v. Public Employees' Retirement Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.