Legal Opinion
United States v. Bang
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1941No. 11837PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought in the District Court of Minnesota to recover from the United States the sum of $6,000 claimed to be due the plaintiff under the provisions of Private Act Number 336, approved by the President of the United States August 27, 1935, 49 Stat. 2194, on account of loss by personal injury in the great Minnesota fire *516of October 12, 1918. Jurisdiction was invoked under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41, Subd, 20. The case was tried to the court and plaintiff had judgment. The United States appeals.
It appears that on the filing of the plaintiff’s petition,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Miguel v. McCarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McLean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Veader v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1945