Legal Opinion

Hood v. Amarillo National Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1991No. D-0980PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

In this cause, we consider whether a final and appealable judgment existed after one defendant filed bankruptcy prior to the trial court’s entry of judgment and there was no severance of the bankrupt defendant. Under these circumstances, we conclude that there was no final and appeal-able judgment. Pursuant to Rule 170 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, a majority of the court grants the motion for rehearing of the application for writ of error of Thomas H. Hood, O.N. Winniford and Frank S. McGee and, without hearing oral argument, reverses the judgment of the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Star-Tel, Inc. v. Nacogdoches Telecommunications, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Howard v. Howard, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  5. Community Investers IX, Ltd. v. Phillips Plastering Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by43 opinions

  1. Espalin v. Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  2. Schauer v. Memorial Care Systems, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. Sanchez v. Hester, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  4. Day Cruises Maritime, L.L.C. v. Christus Spohn Health System, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. Diversified Financial Systems, Inc. v. Hill, Heard, O'Neal, Gilstrap & Goetz, P.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API