Hiroshi Oki and Chizuko Oki v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioners, husband and wife, were ordered deported because after they were admitted to the United States as nonimmigrants pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15), there was a failure to comply with the conditions required by the status pursuant to which they were admitted. They raise five questions on appeal, three of which merit discussion: (1) Is the government es-topped from ordering petitioners’ deportation? (2) Were the petitioners denied due process of law at their deportation hearing? and (3) Should the order of deportation be stayed so that petitioners may apply for an adjustment of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Ruby Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Santiago v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by22 opinions
- Narciso Edgardo Inciong Villena v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Pooran and Mohammad Akbarin v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- General Accounting Office v. General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, Morris L. Shaller, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Cantwell v. County of San MateoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Sunil Lotus Aiyadurai v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and Gerald L. Coyle, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.