Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ketcham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1893No. 16,055PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From tlie Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

Tlie appellee was a railway postal clerk and received injuries in a collision on the appellant’s railroad, *347and he brings this action to recover damages resulting from the injuries, sustained, which are alleged to have occurred on account of the negligence of the appellant and its employes, and without fault on the part of the appellee.

There was a trial and a special verdict returned, and judgment on the verdict in favor of the appellee. As appears from the facts found in the special verdict, the appellee, at the time of receiving the alleged injuries, was a regularly appointed and acting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Blair v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. VoightIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Malott v. Central Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Russell v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hoskins v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Perry v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ArnottIndiana Supreme Court · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API