Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ketcham
Indiana Supreme Court
From tlie Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.
Tlie appellee was a railway postal clerk and received injuries in a collision on the appellant’s railroad, *347and he brings this action to recover damages resulting from the injuries, sustained, which are alleged to have occurred on account of the negligence of the appellant and its employes, and without fault on the part of the appellee.
There was a trial and a special verdict returned, and judgment on the verdict in favor of the appellee. As appears from the facts found in the special verdict, the appellee, at the time of receiving the alleged injuries, was a regularly appointed and acting…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Blair v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. VoightIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by19 opinions
- Malott v. Central Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Russell v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Hoskins v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- Perry v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ArnottIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.