Legal Opinion

People v. Rodman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term .should be affirmed. The verified accusatory instrument, based entirely on nonhearsay, stated precisely the date, time, and place of the act charged, described the act as “ dense smoke from incinerator stack ’ ’, and specified the statutory provision allegedly violated. Thus, the instrument was sufficiently particular to meet the standard required of an information (cf. People v. Love, 306 N. Y. 18, 23-25). Whether the air pollution misdemeanor could have been charged by a “ complaint ” without the exactness of an information need not be determined.

Ch…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MacFarlene Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1985
  2. People v. GrossCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
  3. People v. CunninghamCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2001
  4. People v. GindiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
  5. People v. Oasis Cabana Spa, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API