People v. Rodman
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term .should be affirmed. The verified accusatory instrument, based entirely on nonhearsay, stated precisely the date, time, and place of the act charged, described the act as “ dense smoke from incinerator stack ’ ’, and specified the statutory provision allegedly violated. Thus, the instrument was sufficiently particular to meet the standard required of an information (cf. People v. Love, 306 N. Y. 18, 23-25). Whether the air pollution misdemeanor could have been charged by a “ complaint ” without the exactness of an information need not be determined.
Ch…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MacFarlene Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1985
- People v. GrossCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
- People v. CunninghamCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2001
- People v. GindiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
- People v. Oasis Cabana Spa, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1978