Legal Opinion

People v. Gindi

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided June 26, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*673OPINION OF THE COURT

John Catalog, J.

The defendant is charged by simplified traffic information with aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [1] [a]). He moves for dismissal of the accusatory instrument for facial insufficiency, pursuant to CPL 170.30 (1) (a); 170.35 (1) (a) and 100.40.

The defendant contends that no statutory authority exists for the use of a simplified traffic information as a pleading in the criminal courts of the City of New York. It is the defendant’s position that while the CPL specifically authorizes the use of simplified…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. KeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. NuccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. People v. HohmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. BobackNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. FernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. QuarlesRochester City Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API