Legal Opinion

State v. Crisp, Unpublished Decision (5-22-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 2006No. 1-05-45UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, George Crisp, Jr., appeals a judgment of the Allen County Court of Common Pleas, sentencing him upon his convictions for possession of cocaine. On appeal, Crisp asserts that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial based upon prosecutorial misconduct; that he was deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel; that Crisp could not be convicted of two counts of R.C 2925.11(A); and, that Crisp was sentenced under portions of R.C. 2929.14 that have been found unconstitutional pursuant to State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1,2006-Ohio-856. Finding that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API