Legal Opinion

State v. Barr

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2008No. 07CA34PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Haksha, Judge.

{¶ 1} The state charged James Barr with one count of aggravated possession of drugs after a police officer found a bottle of pills containing methylphenidate during a traffic stop. Barr moved to dismiss this charge on double-jeopardy grounds, asserting that he had already been convicted of drug abuse in violation of Athens City Ordinance 9.06.15 for the same offense. In particular, he argued that the municipal court relied on his possession of “marijuana and a bottle of pills” in finding him guilty of drug abuse. The trial court denied his motion to dismiss, and a jury found him…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DouglasOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Andriy Mihus v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. State of New Hampshire v. Brandon GriffinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API