Oates v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Philippi; Alston G. Dayton, Judge. James Oates, Frank Eedvinski, Hiram Stephens, and Fanny Sullens were found guilty of contempt in violating an inj'unction, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
In these contempt proceedings the plaintiffs in error, defendants below, were found guilty of violation of a temporary restraining order of September 29, 1913, made in the case *203of West Virginia-Pittsburgh Coal Company v. John White et al. The tenor of the order was to enjoin interference with plaintiffs business by using threats, force, intimidation, or persuasion to induce its employes to break their contracts or leave their work, or by using like means to induce any person to refuse to accept employment with plaintiff, and to enjoin trespassing on plaintiff’s premises…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- SavinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. ShippSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- O'MALLEY v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
- Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- State v. BighamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Maytag v. CumminsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.