Legal Opinion

Earnest Taylor v. Vernice Hill

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided July 1, 2004No. 03-03-00540-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00540-CV

Earnest Taylor, Appellant

v.

Vernice Hill, et al., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 12334, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Earnest Taylor and appellees Vernice Hill, et al., are 29 of the 31 heirs of Louis Taylor. Hill and 27 other heirs (collectively, "Hill") filed a petition alleging that they, Taylor, and 2 other heirs owned undivided interests in a 100-acre tract of land in Lee County, estimated to be worth about $400,000. Hill…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Roberson v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sixth RMA Partners, L.P. v. SibleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mondragon v. MondragonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. At & T CORP. v. Rylander, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API