Legal Opinion
Dritch v. Ray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 29, 1944No. 29672PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The State Industrial Commission entered an award in favor of Roy Ray. Thereafter and within the time prescribed by statute the petitioner filed this proceeding.
A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that no bond has been filed and approved by the secretary of the State Industrial Commission as required by section 13363, O. S. 1931, 85 O.S.A. § 29. The motion must be sustained.
We have held that the provisions of section 13363, supra, aré mandatory, and that unless the bond is„ taken and approved by the secretary of the State Industrial Commission, this court is without jurisdiction…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union Indemnity Co. v. SalingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Tidal Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Blake v. SmockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Elam v. Workers' Compensation Court of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Bledsoe v. Munsingwear Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Elam v. Workers' Compensation Court of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Elam v. Workers' Compensation Court of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983