Legal Opinion

Smith v. Siechert

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 6, 1962No. 50549PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This is an action to quiet title. The question presented is, does plaintiff’s evidence overcome the presumption of valid delivery of a duly executed and recorded deed! The trial court held it did not and dismissed plaintiff’s petition. We agree.

Plaintiff, age 81, brings this action against his daughter, Sylvia, age 52, and her husband. It is his claim the deed was taken without his permission and recorded.

If there are any undisputed facts in the record, they and inferences to be drawn therefrom are as follows. Plaintiff and his wife, Ettie, had owned and occupied their home in question here…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jeppesen v. JeppesenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Watts v. ArcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  3. Robinson v. LoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. Adler v. AbkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kane v. CampisanoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API