Legal Opinion
In RE BEISWENGER ENTERPRISES CORP. v. Carletta
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided April 21, 1999No. 91-149-Civ.-T-17CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Respondents/Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and memorandum of law in support (Dkt.120), and the response (Dkt.122).
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Summary judgment is proper if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). The moving party bears the burden of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Farrell Lines Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wrobel v. Conner (In Re Conner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Sphere Drake Insurance v. All American Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Williams v. VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Deen v. EglestonDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2009
- In Re Williams Marine Construction & Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.