Legal Opinion · Dissent

Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. v. Colorado Department of Labor & Employment

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1998No. 96CA1382Published

1Dissent

Judge BRIGGS,

dissenting.

The Department of Labor and Employment (Department) promulgated a regulation that made ineligible for reimbursement from the Underground Storage Tank Fund (Fund) any costs incurred for the cleanup of a petroleum leak discovered before December 22, 1988. In my view, the Department exceeded its statutory authority in making ineligible for reimbursement any costs incurred after the Act became effective, on July 1, 1989. I therefore respectfully dissent.

In 1984 Congress enacted Subtitle I to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6691, et seq. (1994). It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pace Membership Warehouse v. AxelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. United Air Lines, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Adams v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Cartwright v. State Board of AccountancyColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Western Colorado Congress v. Colorado Department of HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API