Legal Opinion

Pace Membership Warehouse v. Axelson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 19, 1997No. 96SC229PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vollack

We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals decision in Axelson v. Pace Membership Warehouse, 923 P.2d 322 (Colo.App.1996), in which the court of appeals deter mined that section 8-42-103(1)(f), 3B C.R.S. (1995 Supp.), violates the equal protection requirements of the United States and Colorado Constitutions. Because we hold that section 8-42-103(l)(f) is rationally related to a legitimate state interest, we conclude that this statutory provision does not violate the constitutional requirements of equal protection. We therefore reverse the court of appeals and remand to reinstate the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Bellendir v. KezerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Allee v. Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. DiazSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  2. Culver v. Ace ElectricSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Dillard v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. Dean v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  5. Dean v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API