Legal Opinion

East Tennessee Telephone Co. v. Board of Councilmen

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 17, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson—

Reversing.

The East Tennessee Telephone Company, through its agent C. E. Taylor, desiring to go into business in Frankfort, applied to the council, which on April 11, 1881, adopted the following resolution:

“The petition of Mr. C. E. Taylor, for permission to the - Telephone Company, to erect telephone poles on different streets of the city and to carry it across the city bridge, was presented and granted.”

Under this authority the Telephone Company erected its poles, established a telephone exchange, and begun business on June 16, 1881. On July 28,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. MansurIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Preachers' Aid Society v. EnglandIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Overstreet v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Princeton v. Princeton Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of CalhounCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Buford v. Pinellas County Power Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. Hardin-County Kentucky Telephone Co. v. City of ElizabethtownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API