Legal Opinion

Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Calhoun

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 17, 1912PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from McLean Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

This suit was instituted by the appellant against the city of Calhoun and the police judge thereof for the purpose of testing the validity of an ordinance that imposed a license tax of $100 upon appellant for the privilege of operating an exchange in the city and with the purpose of having the ordinance declared invalid.

Calhoun is a city of the fifth class, and the ordinance attacked imposed upon “each telephone exchange” a license fee of $100. The validity of the ordinance is assailed upon the ground that a telephone company, which pays both an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Providence v. Providence Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Brown-Foreman Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Bradford v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Cum. Telep. & Teleg. Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  5. Wells v. Town of Mt. OlivetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Aetna Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. City of Covington v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. City of Lexington v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Hatcher v. Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. American Railway Express Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API