Legal Opinion

Pinnacle Armor, Inc. v. United States

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 12, 2013No. 1:07-CV-01655 LJO DLBPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (DOC. 71)

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Pinnacle Armor, Inc. (“Pinnacle”) produces armor designed to protect buildings, vehicles, and the human body. Among Pinnacle’s primary customers are local law enforcement agencies that often utilize federal subsidies to purchase body armor. Availability of at least one such subsidy is conditioned upon certification that the body armor was manufactured in compliance with the most recent standards set by the National Institute of Justice (“NIJ”), an arm of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. SchreiberSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Occidental Engineering Company v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bruce v. AzarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  2. Tinian Women Association v. UsdnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
  4. (PS) Miller v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. A.M.Q.A., et al. v. MONICA B. LUGO, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API