Legal Opinion

(PS) Miller v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 2, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02113Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALAN MILLER, No. 2:22-cv-02113 KJM AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and 14 TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AGENCY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and the case was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). This case is brought pursuant to the Tahoe Regional 20 Planning Compact, P.L. 96-551,

94 Stat. 3233

(“Compact”) and, as an action for review on the 21 administrative record, is governed by Federal Rule of Civil…

2Cases cited24 opinions

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.