Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Rodriguez Ospina, United States of America v. Oilsin Cabezas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 2, 1984No. 83-5249, 83-5227PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, District Judge:
Jose Rodriguez Ospina and Oilsin Velasco Cabezas appeal from convictions of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. Co-conspirators and co-defendants Carlos Carrera and Vicente Romero Rivera, who were also convicted of the same offenses, are not involved in this appeal. Each appellant appeals on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, and that certain evidence was improperly admitted. Ospina…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Domingo S. Canieso and Siu Tsien ChouCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James MintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Robert Joseph SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Luis Alvaro HoyosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- United States v. Jaleh NazemianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Harlan Peacock and Harold PeacockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Danny Ray PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Crespo de LlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.