Legal Opinion

United States v. Domingo S. Canieso and Siu Tsien Chou

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 22, 1972No. 262, Docket 72-1789PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Chief Judge:

Domingo S. Canieso, a Philippine diplomat assigned to that country’s embassy in Laos, and Siu Tsien Chou, a Chinese national, appeal from their well-merited conviction of conspiring to import approximately thirty-four pounds of almost pure heroin from Southeast Asia into the United States and related offenses. Both appellants challenge the judge’s ruling, at a pretrial suppression hearing, which sustained the validity of their arrests and the consequent seizure of the heroin; Chou raises some additional points.

I

At the suppression hearing the Government did not offer the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. People v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. William ColonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Cara Woods, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. HenselCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API