Legal Opinion

United States v. Harlan Peacock and Harold Peacock

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1985No. 84-1007, 84-1011PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

The appellants challenge their convictions for the manufacture and distribution of controlled substances, conspiracy, and related offenses. First, they attack the validity of a search warrant issued for their residential property, arguing that the supporting affidavit did not set forth probable cause and that it contained a material omission. Second, appellants maintain that the consent obtained for a later search of other property was invalid because coerced. Third, they contend there was insufficient evidence to support their convictions. Fourth, they allege error as…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Errol F. Remsing and Jerry H. DefoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Edward TerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API