Legal Opinion
Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District Ex Rel. Tulsa County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 15, 1980No. 54409PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
This application to assume original jurisdiction and a petition for a writ of prohibition was filed after the trial court refused to sustain petitioner’s special appearance and motion to quash summons and pleas to the jurisdiction and venue:
The Commercial Bank & Trust Company, petitioner [Bank], had loaned sums of money to Imperial Coal Company, in the amount of approximately $1,050,000.00. The loans were in default. The loans were secured by guarantees executed by Charles F. Irish, Mark S. Rose, Charles S. Holmes, Joel S. Janeo, Stan P. Doyle, and the Nathan James Trust. On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Tulsa City Lines, Inc. v. MainsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Ellan v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Grooms v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Townsend v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- May Dept. Stores Co. v. WilanskyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
- Coyne v. Grupo Industrial Trieme, S.A. de C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Henkel Corp. v. DegremontDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- CITREXSA, SA v. LandsmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Manitowoc Western Co., Inc. v. MontonenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.