Legal Opinion
Henkel Corp. v. Degremont
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 19, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 90-6413PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
Plaintiff Henkel Corporation (“Henkel”) brought this action alleging that defendants Degremont, S.A. (“Degremont”) and L’Air Liquide (“Air Liquide”) breached a joint venture agreement through which Henkel would acquire control over an ozone technology business in North America. Henkel’s Complaint alleges breach of contract in Count One, promissory estoppel in Count Two and breach of fiduciary duty in Count Three.
Degremont and Air Liquide have moved to dismiss Henkel’s Complaint1 on the grounds that: (i) Henkel’s service of process was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gallagher v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- May Dept. Stores Co. v. WilanskyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
- Malaysia International Shipping Corporation v. Sinochem International Co. LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Gudavadze v. KayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Manitowoc Western Co., Inc. v. MontonenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.