Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Clark

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 1, 1969No. 21,613Published

1DissentFerguson, Judge

I dissent.

I believe that my brothers too casually dismiss the obvious need to uphold the absolute verity of the record of trial. This is a necessary concomitant to the proper administration of justice. As Chief Judge Quinn, writing in the early case of United States v Galloway, 2 US CM A 433, 435, 9 CMR 63, said:

“. . . The great weight' of authority in the United States holds that the records and judgments of the trial court import absolute verity and may not, in the absence of a charge of fraud, be challenged. Edminston v Hunter, 161 F2d 691, 692 (CA 10th Cir); Thomas v Hunter, 153 F2d 834,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. WaltersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. BrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. GallowayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. SolakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API