Legal Opinion

Chase v. Cameron

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1901No. L.A. No. 845PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

Judgment was entered for the plaintiff upon the findings, and the defendants appeal therefrom and from an order denying a new trial.

Defendant John Cameron, being the owner of certain real estate, on September 21,1895, entered into a contract with one G. A. Clark, whereby he agreed to sell the same to Clark for the sum of $3,550,.—$2,000 to be paid December 1, 1897, and $1,550 to be paid December 1, 1898. As to interest upon the purchase-money, the contract provided as follows: “It is hereby agreed that the second party hereto pays to the first parties $240, each and every year, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Burris v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Tuffree v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Von Drachenfels v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Harrigan v. MowryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Robinson v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Aalwyn's Law Institute v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Coleman v. JaggersIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API