Harrigan v. Mowry
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of Commissioner Vanclief.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
The judgment in this case was reversed by Department One, the opinion having been written by Commissioner Yanclief. A rehearing was granted. The second argument and further consideration of the case has convinced us that the decision of the department was right, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned commissioner. In addition to what is said in the former opinion, it may be remarked that the evidence clearly proved that the plaintiff was the owner of the equitable title to the property in litigation, and that the defendant was the owner of the legal title thereto as her trustee.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Von Drachenfels v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Brewer v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Learned v. WeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- McDonald v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Robinson v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Tuffree v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Roberts v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.