Legal Opinion

SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 8, 2005No. Nos. 03-2185, 03-1313PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

ORDER

Petitions for rehearing en banc having been filed by both the Appellants-Cross-Appellees and Appellees-Cross-Appel-lants, responses thereto having been invited by the court and filed by both the Appellants-Cross-Appellees and Appel-lees-Cross-Appellants, and briefs of ami-cus curiae having been filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Generic Pharmaceutical Association, the petitions for rehearing en banc, responses and briefs of amicus curiae having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service, and a poll having been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smithkline Beecham Corporation and Beecham Group, P.L.C. v. Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  3. Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Schwarz Pharma, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
  4. Chatz v. Alice Rhoads Living Trust (In re Rhoads)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  5. Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API