Legal Opinion
Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 8, 2005No. 2003-1285Published
1Opinion of the Court
403 F.3d 1328
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and Beecham Group, P.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
APOTEX CORP., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants.
No. 03-2185.
No. 03-1313.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 8, 2005.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Judge Richard A. Posner.
Ford F. Farabow, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, filed a petition for rehearing en banc for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the petition were Robert D. Bajefsky, Howard W. Levine, Scott J.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Continental Can Company Usa, Inc. And Continental Pet Technologies, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, Hoover Universal, Inc. And Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- In re OelrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.