Legal Opinion

Clement v. Prestwich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 3, 1983No. 82-570PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard

Plaintiff, Charlotte K. Clement, appeals from an order dismissing with prejudice her complaint for legal malpractice against defendant, Howard H. Prestwich, an attorney. Plaintiff brought suit based on a purported assignment of a legal malpractice claim against defendant, which plaintiff had received from Linda King. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, ruling that a claim for legal malpractice could not be assigned. The issue plaintiff raises on appeal is whether a cause of action for legal malpractice is assignable.

The facts, as alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, are set…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Soules v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Christison v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Chaffee v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Brocato v. Prairie State Farmers Ins. Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Coffey Ex Rel. Collins v. Jefferson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
  4. Washington v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Jackson v. Rogers & WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API