Legal Opinion
In Re Bruener
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1934No. C.D. 1366. En BancPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This case is here on tbe petition of Theodore B. Bruener, a disbarred attorney, asking to be restored to the privilege of practicing law in this state.
The petitioner was disbarred December 11, 1930. In re Bruener, 159 Wash. 504, 294 Pac. 254. December 1, 1932, he petitioned this court for reinstatement, and the matter was referred to the then board of law examiners, two of which board, after a hearing, recommended his reinstatement and one member dissented therefrom. The matter was here heard upon the report of the board, and February 6, 1933, the petition was denied. March 9,1934, a petition…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kepler v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- State ex rel. Spillman v. PriestNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- In re SimpsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re MashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of GowanWashington Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re StumpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. MurrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WalgrenWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re SeijasWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against RoselliniWashington Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.