Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided April 5, 2016No. MDL DOCKET NO. 2329 1:13-cv-297-WSDPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1328OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. ’s (“Defendant” or “Wright Medical”)1 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, Motion for-New Trial and to Amend the Judgment [241] (“Renewed Motion”).2

I. BACKGROUND3

Plaintiff Robyn Christiansen (“Plaintiff’) filed this action against Defendant Wright Medical based on the failure of the Wright Conserve Hip Implant System (the “hip replacement device”) that was surgically implanted on April 24, 2006, to replace…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. American Home Assurance Company v. Glenn Estess & Associates, Inc., D/B/A Sales Consultants of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bayes v. Biomet, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  2. Hicks v. Anne Arundel CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  3. Oester v. Wright Medical Technology IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  4. Oester v. Wright Medical Technology IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Webb v. City of VeniceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API