Legal Opinion

Oester v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 17, 2021No. 2:19-cv-04763Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Greg Oester, et al., ) No. CV-19-04763-PHX-SPL ) 9 ) No. CV-19-04765-PHX-SPL 10 Plaintiffs, ) No. CV-19-05586-PHX-SRB vs. ) N o. CV-20-00552-PHX-DJH 11 ) No. CV-20-01703-PHX-GMS ) No. CV-20-08163-PHX-SMB 12 Wright Medical Technology, ) Incorporated, ) 13 ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER 14 15 Before the Court are the following motions: 16 1. Plaintiff Susan McAleavey’s Rule 42 Motion for Transfer and Consolidation (Doc. 17 34); 18 2. Plaintiffs Greg and Lynda Oester’s Rule 42 Motion for Transfer and Consolidation 19 of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. William R. DrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. In re Wright Medical Technology, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  4. Robyn Christiansen v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Christiansen v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API