Tse Teng Lin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CASTILLE, Justice.
The issue before this Court in these consolidated appeals is whether an appeal from the denial of unemployment compensation benefits is timely filed if the envelope in which the appeal is mailed bears the mark of a private postage meter rather than a United States postmark and is received by appellee one day after the deadline for the filing of an appeal. Because we agree with the Commonwealth Court that a United States postmark is necessary for a determination of the timeliness of an appeal, we affirm.
The facts of the consolidated cases are virtually…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Vereb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Edwards v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Darroch v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dumberth v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Renda v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- UGI Utilities, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Lozier Corp. v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equal.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.