Legal Opinion

United States v. Kolsky

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 18287PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

The United States of America brought this civil action against the defendants, Benjamin Kolsky and John Gallo, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26(c) of the Surplus Property Act of 1944. 58 Stat. 780 (1944), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1635(c), repealed June 30,1949, and reenacted as 63 Stat. 392 (1949), 40 U.S. C.A. § 489(c), to recover damages provided in Section 26(b) (1) of that Act for wartime fraud allegedly perpetrated by said defendants in the purchase of surplus property from the War Assets Administration. Defendant, Kolsky, has moved for summary judgment on the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. United States Ex Rel. McCans v. Armour & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1956
  3. United States v. SalvatoreDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. United States ex rel. Bergman v. Abbot LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. United States v. BNP Paribas SADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API