Barnes v. Quigley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Defendant is an attorney. So is the plaintiff, who sued him for “unlawful interference into the relationship between attorney and client.” The case was tried to the court and resulted in a finding for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
Defendant in his capacity as claims representative for an insurance company was attempting to settle claims arising from a collision between a truck insured by his company and an automobile owned by Roscoe Perry, in which collision injuries were suffered by Denson Gaddies, a passenger in the Perry car. On the day following the accident, defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klauder v. CregarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Lurie v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Keels v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Herbits v. Constitution Indemnity Co. of PhiladelphiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Nichols v. OrrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Chang v. Louis & Alexander, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Patton Boggs, LLP v. CHEVRON CORPORATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Nnaka v. Federal Republic of NigeriaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- King & King, Chartered v. Harbert International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.