Legal Opinion

Reid v. Field

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 10, 1887PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to judgment of circuit court of Culpeper county overruling the demurrer of the plaintiff to the defendant’s special plea in the action at law, wherein Joseph Reid, who sued for the benefit of Ober & Son, was plaintiff, and H. S. Field was defendant. ,

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson,

stating the case), delivered the opinion of the court.

The sole question to be determined here is, did the circuit court err in its judgment overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s said special plea ? In order to a proper solution of this question, it becomes necessary to enquire into the sufficiency of the plea which was demurred to.

A general demurrer is one which excepts to the sufficiency of a previous pleading in general terms, without showing specifically the nature of the objection; and such demurrer is sufficient when the objection is on matter of substance. 1…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Filley v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Lowber v. BangsSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Strange v. FloydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
  4. Commercial Bank of Manchester v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Baird v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State v. FrisbeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Brewer v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  4. Kelso v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Ex Parte GilbertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API