Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint of Knox

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 2003No. Docket 230755PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, P.J.

Lotel, Inc., doing business as Coordinated Billing Services, appeals the April 24, 2000, order of the Public Service Commission that found that Lotel had violated the antislamming provisions set forth in the Michigan Telecommunications Act (mta), MCL 484.2101 et seq., and commission rules. The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the specific facts of this case, this Court has jurisdiction over an appeal from a commission order finding a telecommunications provider to have violated the mta’s “antislamming” provision following a contested-case hearing. We conclude that the Ingham…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Horace v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Walsh v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. in Re Petition of Tuscola County Treasurer for ForeclosureMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. In Re FGMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Dr Timothy Meyer v. Oakland Community College Bd of TrusteesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. In Re Alondra EddinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API